if True> = False: Python "True" Go "What ???"

\huge{True >= False} What this…… TL;DR

Python3

arr = ['Apple', 'Gorilla', 'Rappa']
print(arr[False])
#Apple
print(arr[True])
#Gorilla

It feels too bad

Introduction

I'm Nia Hoshino, a virtual engineer. This article is the 17th day (impression of the article) of Hoshino Near Advent Calendar 2020. To be correct, it is a solution to the question in program processing for the sentence True> = False that appears in the article.

Python conditional branching is True

Python3

if True >= False:
    print('True')
else:
    print('False')
# True

why

Python's Bool type is implemented as a subclass of integers Treats 1> = 0 and returns True. Boolean Object — Python 3 \ .9 \ .1 Document If you divide by False, Zero Division Error will be returned.

print(str(True + False));
# 1
print(str(True + True));
# 2
print(str(False + False));
# 0
print(True / False)
# ZeroDivisionError: division by zero

For other languages

** Typed loose fluffy language first Javascript: true ** Javascript division by zero results in Infinity

Javascript

console.log(true >= false);
// true
console.log(true);
// true
console.log(true + true);
// 2
console.log(true + false);
// 1
console.log(true / false);
// Infinity

** Statically typed Golang: operator> = not defined on bool ** Really correct behavior

Go

package main
import "fmt"
func main(){
    if true >= false{
        fmt.Println("true")    
    }else{
        fmt.Println("false")
    }
    // invalid operation: true >= false (operator >= not defined on bool)
}