AtCoder Beginner Contest 111 C - //// Difficulty: 822
This theme, hash sorting Ruby Duplicate elements, it's a hash, isn't it? The solution is similar to the previous * AtCoder ABC 113 C in Ruby, Perl and Java *.
ruby.rb
n = gets.to_i
v = gets.split.map(&:to_i)
p = Hash.new(0)
q = Hash.new(0)
n.times do |i|
p[v[i]] += 1 if i.even?
q[v[i]] += 1 if i.odd?
end
ps = Hash[p.sort_by{|k, v| -v}].keys
qs = Hash[q.sort_by{|k, v| -v}].keys
x, y, ans = 0, 0, n / 2
f = false
ps.size.times do |i|
x = ps[i]
qs.size.times do |j|
if x != qs[j]
y = qs[j]
f = true
break
end
end
break if f
end
ans = n - p[x] - q[y] if f
x, y = 0, 0
f = false
qs.size.times do |i|
x = qs[i]
ps.size.times do |j|
if x != ps[j]
y = ps[j]
f = true
break
end
end
break if f
end
ans = n - q[x] - p[y] if f && ans > n - q[x] - p[y]
puts ans
hash.rb
ps = Hash[p.sort_by{|k, v| -v}].keys
In ABC113C, it was a * Perl * -like sort, but this time I tried a * Ruby * -like sort. Perl
perl.pl
chomp (my $n = <STDIN>);
chomp (my @v = split / /, <STDIN>);
my (%p, %q);
for my $i (0..$n-1) {
if ($i % 2 == 0) {
$p{$v[$i]}++;
} else {
$q{$v[$i]}++;
}
}
my @ps = sort {$p{$b}<=>$p{$a}} keys %p;
my @qs = sort {$q{$b}<=>$q{$a}} keys %q;
my ($x, $y) = (0, 0);
my $ans = $n / 2;
my $f = 0;
for my $i (0..$#ps) {
$x = $ps[$i];
for my $j (0..$#qs) {
if ($x != $qs[$j]) {
$y = $qs[$j];
$f = 1;
last;
}
}
last if $f;
}
$ans = $n - $p{$x} - $q{$y} if $f;
($x, $y) = (0, 0);
my $f = 0;
for my $i (0..$#qs) {
$x = $qs[$i];
for my $j (0..$#ps) {
if ($x != $ps[$j]) {
$y = $ps[$j];
$f = 1;
last;
}
}
last if $f;
}
$ans = $n - $q{$x} - $p{$y} if $f && $ans > $n - $q{$x} - $p{$y};
print "$ans\n";
hash.pl
my @ps = sort {$p{$b}<=>$p{$a}} keys %p;
java.java
import java.util.*;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
int n = Integer.parseInt(sc.next());
Map<Integer, Integer> p = new HashMap<>();
Map<Integer, Integer> q = new HashMap<>();
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
int v = Integer.parseInt(sc.next());
if (i % 2 == 0) {
if (p.containsKey(v)) {
p.put(v, p.get(v) + 1);
} else {
p.put(v, 1);
}
} else {
if (q.containsKey(v)) {
q.put(v, q.get(v) + 1);
} else {
q.put(v, 1);
}
}
}
sc.close();
Map<Integer, Integer> ps = p.entrySet().stream()
.sorted(Map.Entry.<Integer, Integer>comparingByValue().reversed()
.thenComparing(Map.Entry.comparingByKey()))
.collect(Collectors.toMap(Map.Entry::getKey, Map.Entry::getValue, (e1, e2) -> e1, LinkedHashMap::new));
Map<Integer, Integer> qs = q.entrySet().stream()
.sorted(Map.Entry.<Integer, Integer>comparingByValue().reversed()
.thenComparing(Map.Entry.comparingByKey()))
.collect(Collectors.toMap(Map.Entry::getKey, Map.Entry::getValue, (e1, e2) -> e1, LinkedHashMap::new));
List<Integer> pss = new ArrayList<>(ps.keySet());
List<Integer> qss = new ArrayList<>(qs.keySet());
int x = 0, y = 0, ans = n / 2;
boolean f = false;
for (int i = 0; i < pss.size(); i++) {
x = pss.get(i);
for (int j = 0; j < qss.size(); j++) {
if (x != qss.get(j)) {
y = qss.get(j);
f = true;
break;
}
}
if (f)
break;
}
if (f)
ans = n - p.get(x) - q.get(y);
x = 0;
y = 0;
f = false;
for (int i = 0; i < qss.size(); i++) {
x = qss.get(i);
for (int j = 0; j < pss.size(); j++) {
if (x != pss.get(j)) {
y = pss.get(j);
f = true;
break;
}
}
if (f)
break;
}
if (f && ans > n - q.get(x) - p.get(y))
ans = n - q.get(x) - p.get(y);
System.out.println(ans);
}
}
Sorting * Java * hashes is very difficult to implement. If you usually do * Java *, do you sort by class?
Ruby | Perl | Java | |
---|---|---|---|
Code length | 694 Byte | 808 Byte | 2646 Byte |
Execution time | 164 ms | 131 ms | 649 ms |
memory | 24808 KB | 28616 KB | 54320 KB |
Referenced site
Recommended Posts