[PYTHON] AtCoder Beginner Contest 044 Review of past questions

Time required

スクリーンショット 2020-02-01 15.13.49.png

Impressions

D The problem was tight ... I made a lot of mistakes because I didn't do much of this type of DP for the C problem, so it is necessary to cover the DP properly ... D problem, I seemed to be able to pass the lie with an appropriate solution, but it is not good at all, so I will read the answer ... (It's disappointing that it doesn't seem to be toothy when it turns yellow. After all, I felt that this problem could be solved by reviewing it.)

Problem A

Will it exceed or not exceed k?

answerA.py


n=int(input())
k=int(input())
x=int(input())
y=int(input())
print(x*n if n<=k else x*k+y*(n-k))

B problem

You can find out how many are there by sorting and group-by. If there is an odd number, No is output.

answerB.py


def groupby(a):
    a2=[[a[0],1]]
    for i in range(1,len(a)):
        if a2[-1][0]==a[i]:
            a2[-1][1]+=1
        else:
            a2.append([a[i],1])
    return a2
w=list(input())
w.sort()
w=groupby(w)
for i in w:
    if i[1]%2==1:
        print("No")
        break
else:
    print("Yes")

C problem

I feel that the C problem was a little difficult this time. The average should be A, but after all, when there are n sheets, the total will be n * A. Also, I thought about DP ** because it is difficult to greedily think about such a case and I need to choose a card well (I feel that most DPs have a pattern to choose well within the limits). .. However, although it is just a DP, I am quite confused because I usually think about min and max. First, record ** dp [j] [k] how many cases the integer j can be represented by k cards ** (dp [0] [0] is easy to calculate later) Leave it at 1.). Also, when considering the integer $ x_i $ in dp [j] [k], when dp [j] [k] = 0, the integer j cannot be represented by k cards at that point, so update it. However, when dp [j] [k] $ \ ne0 $, update as `dp_sub [j + x [i]] [k + 1] = dp [j] [k]` ( Since there is one card at a time, you need to prepare dp_sub.) Then, the update is completed by reflecting (+) what you wrote down in dp_sub in dp, and you can think of this as i: 1 → n. Finally, the answer is obtained by adding the elements (dp [a * (i + 1)] [i + 1] `) where the average of the integers of dp is exactly a.

answerC.py


n,a=map(int,input().split())
x=list(map(int,input().split()))
x.sort(reverse=True)
sx=sum(x)
dp=[[0]*(n+1) for i in range(sx+1)]
dp[0][0]=1
for i in range(n):
    dp_sub=[[0]*(n+1) for j in range(sx+1)]
    for j in range(sx+1):
        for k in range(n+1):
            if dp[j][k]!=0:
                dp_sub[j+x[i]][k+1]=dp[j][k]
    for j in range(sx+1):
        for k in range(n+1):
            dp[j][k]+=dp_sub[j][k]
cnt=0

for i in range(min(sx//a,n)):
    cnt+=dp[a*(i+1)][i+1]
print(cnt)

D problem

Hmmm, isn't the answer too genius no matter how many times you look at it? Below, I will organize in my own words according to this answer.

First, if you think about the time of ** n \ <s **, f (b, n) will always be less than or equal to b (I haven't proved it, but I don't think it's that difficult). There is no b that satisfies f (b, n) = s (outputs -1). Next, consider the time of ** n = s **, b \ <= n is f (b, n) \ <s and b > = n + 1 is (b, n) = s, so b It's easy to see that = n + 1 is the smallest. Below, we will proceed with the discussion as ** n > s **.

First, it is $ n \ leqq 10 ^ {11} $, but since it is not monotonic and binary search cannot be used, it may be possible to pass it with ** $ O (\ sqrt {n}) $, which seems to be the next small amount of calculation. I suspect it is not ** (I noticed this, it is an image ** that narrows down to the accessible range with the computational complexity of ** $ O (\ sqrt {n}) $). For the time being, b: 2 → $ \ sqrt {n} $ to find the smallest b for which $ f (b, n) = s $, and if not found, $ \ sqrt {n} <b \ leqq n $ for the smallest Suppose you are looking for b. Then, $ \ sqrt {n} <b \ leqq n $, so if you notice that ** n is always 2 digits ** when you think in b-ary, $ 1 \ leqq p <b $, $ 0 \ leqq q It can be expressed as <b $ by $ n = pb + q $… (1). Furthermore, $ p + q = s $… (2) can be said from the subject.

Also, from (1), $ n = pb + q> pb> p ^ 2 $, so $ 1 \ leqq p <\ sqrt {n} $ can be said (because b is also decided if either p or q is decided. ** Motivation to narrow the range of p and q **.). Therefore, the candidate for p is found by $ O (\ sqrt {n}) $, and b is uniquely determined as $ b = (ns) / p + 1 $ from equations (1) and (2). The solution can be found by searching for the smallest b such that $ f (b, n) = s $.

Implementing the above, it becomes as follows. (It took me an hour and a half to debug, forgetting the = in the part of the code that says ``` here . I'm about to die.)

answerD.py


import math
n=int(input())
s=int(input())

def f(b,n):
    m=math.floor(n/b)
    if n>=b:#here
        return f(b,m) + n%b
    else:
        return n

if n<s:
    print(-1)
elif n==s:
    print(n+1)
else:
    for i in range(2,int(math.sqrt(n))+1):
        if f(i,n)==s:
            print(i)
            break
    else:
        for p in range(int(math.sqrt(n)),0,-1):
            if (n-s)%p==0:
                b=(n-s)//p+1
                if f(b,n)==s:
                    print(b)
                    break
        else:
            print(-1)

Recommended Posts

AtCoder Beginner Contest 102 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 085 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 062 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 113 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 074 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 051 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 119 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 151 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 075 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 054 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 110 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 117 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 070 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 105 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 112 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 076 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 089 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 069 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 079 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 056 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 087 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 093 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 046 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 123 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 049 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 078 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 047 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 104 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 057 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 121 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 090 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 103 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 061 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 044 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 083 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 048 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 124 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 116 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 097 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 088 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 092 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 099 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 065 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 053 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 094 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 063 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 107 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 071 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 064 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 082 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 084 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 068 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 058 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 043 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 098 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 114 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 045 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 120 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 108 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 106 Review of past questions
AtCoder Beginner Contest 122 Review of past questions