Processing speed with and without static

static Because static has an image of shared property If you are always sitting in a corner of memory, I tried from the image that using static is faster.

let's try it

Processing speed measurement class.java

package mk42;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.stream.IntStream;

public class StreamProcessingTest {
	private static final List<String> list = Arrays.asList("a", "s", "k");
	public static void main(String[] args) {
		Long start = System.nanoTime();
		test();
		Long end = System.nanoTime();
		Mk42.echo.accept("Processing TIme : " + (end - start) + "ns");
		/** ----------not static---------- */
		Mk42.echo.accept("next test");
		NotStaticProcessingTest no = new NotStaticProcessingTest();
		Long start2 = System.nanoTime();
		no.test2();
		Long end2 = System.nanoTime();
		Mk42.echo.accept("Processing TIme : " + (end2 - start2) + "ns");
	}
	private static void test() {
		// twice
		list.stream().forEach(v -> execute());
		list.stream().filter(v -> !v.equals("a")).forEach(v -> qwe());
		//The processing time does not change much whether multiple processing is performed inside the termination operation or divided..
	}
	private static void execute() {
		List<Integer> a = new ArrayList<Integer>();
		IntStream.range(0, 10).forEach(v -> a.add(2));
	}
	private static void qwe() {
		List<Integer> a = new ArrayList<Integer>();
		IntStream.range(0, 10000000).forEach(v -> a.add(2));
	}
}

A class that summarizes methods for non-static experiments.java

package mk42;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.stream.IntStream;

public class NotStaticProcessingTest {
	private static final List<String> list = Arrays.asList("a", "s", "k");
	public void run() {
		System.out.println("qwe");
	}
	public void test() {
		// onece
		list.stream().forEach(v -> {
			execute();
			if(!v.equals("a"))
				qwe();
		});
		//The processing time does not change much whether multiple processing is performed inside the termination operation or divided..
	}
	public void test2() {
		// twice
		list.stream().forEach(v -> execute());
		list.stream().filter(v -> !v.equals("a")).forEach(v -> qwe());
		//The processing time does not change much whether multiple processing is performed inside the termination operation or divided..
	}
	private void execute() {
		List<Integer> a = new ArrayList<Integer>();
		IntStream.range(0, 10).forEach(v -> a.add(2));
	}
	private void qwe() {
		List<Integer> a = new ArrayList<Integer>();
		IntStream.range(0, 10000000).forEach(v -> a.add(2));
	}
}

result

static -> Processing TIme : 222787700ns
Non-static-> Processing TIme : 176494000ns

What? I thought, but when I experimented multiple times

static.

Processing TIme : 225677500ns
Processing TIme : 223625900ns
Processing TIme : 223150400ns
Processing TIme : 228877000ns
Processing TIme : 223187400ns

Non-static.

Processing TIme : 178923100ns
Processing TIme : 167760600ns
Processing TIme : 190593300ns
Processing TIme : 180728700ns
Processing TIme : 216358400ns

It's a bit annoying to average, but it's not I feel like there is little blurring

The strength of static is not that it is fast, but that there is little fluctuation in processing speed ...?